Given the Quicksilver source code is now out in the open, I’m trying to learn from it while at the same time cleaning it up. Here’s what I’ve done so far.
Bug fixes
A lot of features were buried in the source, available only by setting some preferences to allow them. Mostly it was due to buggy implementation or pending improvements. I managed to resurrect a few of these nifty ones and fix a few old bugs that have annoyed me for ages.
Color handling
Color handling was commented out in the Quicksilver source; probably because it resulted in errors. A simple change in the source allowed correct handling of color values, and the code for drawing the icon was already there. I added functionality to allow dropping colors from the Quicksilver object pane into color wells and the like - which is what makes this useful.

Uninstalled plugins
Added a plugin set to the plugins preference pane to list plugins that you haven’t yet installed or downloaded. Not sure why this was commented out; I didn’t have to add any new code here.

Triggers
There was a very annoying bug in the triggers preference pane that haunted me from the day I started using Quicksilver. Switching to the iTunes trigger set resulted in errors, and often froze or messed up Quicksilver. Finally, it’s fixed, and we can see and use these triggers.

Speaking of plugins; I think I heard mention of a “plugin check bug” fixed somewhere, but it wasn’t working for me so I’ve also fixed the issue where the plugin list would be blank until you hit refresh.
Miscellaneous bug fixes
Other things like crashing when you try to relaunch with the “Customize” preference pane open, and with the source, hundreds of warnings when trying to compile, errors in the shell scripts when working in a path with non-alphanumeric characters, etc. have also been fixed.

Tidy up
[I wonder] how long it’ll take people to notice the Frankensteinian nature of the source and respond - appropriately - with pitchforks. Alcor
I’ll have to agree with Alcor - to say the source is a mess would be an understatement. There are hundreds of compiler warnings, unused or unimplemented features, classes, objects, code, structures, nibs, etc. Hundreds. I’ve tried to remove as much of the redundant or test code as possible and I’ve yet to reach the end. Mind you, I’ve been doing this for hours a day for the past week. The formatting and indentation is almost as bad. I’m cleaning that up too, with some good old regular expressions and elbow grease. As I go, I’m also trying to improve the logic where I see potential for improvement. Already the application is feeling more responsive but I want to also reduce the memory footprint.
Why go to all this trouble? Mainly, to
- Make the source more readable; make it easier for people to understand what’s going on.
- Improve the performance of the application in both speed and memory usage.
- Fix existing bugs and add new features.
In the meantime, I’ll continue my clean up of the Quicksilver source and when it’s lookin’ fine perhaps post it up (the QS license doesn’t really say much about the source, so I might have to ask Alcor first. Perhaps he’d like to add it to the subversion repository after reviewing?).
Lastly, let me just say, I’ve learnt a lot from looking at the source code to Quicksilver. There are some very neat tricks in there, and great little snippets that could be very useful elsewhere. So thank you Mr. Jitkoff; thank you for writing the application, and thank you for the releasing the source code. It is highly appreciated.
67 Comments so far
Leave a commentPages: « 1 2 [3] Show All
I’ll be committing the changes into the B5X branch of the Google Code repo very soon.
uttered by Ankur on December 12, 2007 1:57 pm | Permalink
Great to hear that Ankur!
uttered by Jono on December 12, 2007 4:19 pm | Permalink
How come Apple does not pick up the ball? QS is filling out a definite OS deficiency and should be integrated with Spotlight somehow (rather the opposite). Keep up the good work. This has been an OS caveat since the days of the Launcher…Remember the rocket icon?
uttered by Macouno on December 12, 2007 7:27 pm | Permalink
An inspiring post! Please put your results up as soon as possible. Those bugs drive me crazy. Thank you.
voiced by Duncan on December 13, 2007 4:57 pm | Permalink
I can’t wait for these to get fixed - the iTunes triggers bug is my problem and cannot seem to find a fix anywhere.
composed by MacMan on December 14, 2007 4:31 am | Permalink
Thank you, thank you for keeping the development of Quicksilver going. I would pay $$ for it–I love it that much. You just made one nerd’s day!
professed by JayhawkBabe on December 14, 2007 9:02 am | Permalink
Big props for undertaking this work! It would be incredibly to see a community coalesce around the QS code… and it’s efforts like yours that will set the bar for participation.
reported by Chris Messina on December 17, 2007 10:27 am | Permalink
thank you!! if QS dies it would be like losing a limb!
recorded by Anonymous on January 10, 2008 12:08 am | Permalink
Thanks a bunch for doing this. I love Quicksilver, and I couldn’t live without it!
recorded by jolleyjoe on January 15, 2008 7:56 am | Permalink
I’m only commenting to echo what’s already been written. I love QS and am happy to see that it may yet survive. I would gladly contribute to the programming side if I were capable, but since that’s not the case….. another person willing to donate to see a great app continue on. Does anyone know of any other efforts or groups working on QS code?
published by Angel on January 19, 2008 7:53 am | Permalink
Best…Utility…Ever.
I would support any donation, subscription, merchandise, shareware or other initiative to ensure that QS never fades away.
My Mac is not a Mac without it.
mentioned by Matthew Treder on January 20, 2008 1:32 pm | Permalink
I am a huge fan of QS and would hate to see it die. Thank you for picking up the torch!
published by seyDoggy on February 1, 2008 3:36 am | Permalink
let me add my voice to those willing to pay well (up to $100) to have quicksilver continue its progress and even possibly become more stable and documented.
voiced by pendolino on February 8, 2008 5:37 am | Permalink
Ankur, you are the wind beneath my (OS’s) wings! Keep up the good work, and let us know how we can support you.
recorded by RJ on February 10, 2008 8:05 am | Permalink
First of all, excuse my english: I’m an italian QS user.
When I knew Alcor dropped QS implementation for Leopard I was very sad: I appreciated and used QS a lot, but Leopard too. In the first Leopard release (10.5.0) QS did’t work (that is proxy object and menu item, or tagging, or getting file info). I bought Launchbar (following Alcor suggestion), but I’dont like it very much (it’s just a launcher, and file managing is not even comparable with QS). Yesterday I had some time and sadly tried relaunce my loved QS. Surprise: my uninstalled old version, on Leopard upgraded to 10.5.2, has regained some functionalities. Is it a dream? I can get finder selection (multiple files too) and act on that file in QS (move or copy them). I got menu item too! My version is 3815, and I never got a freeze.
Then I serched the web and found this Ankur release, but I hesitate to upgrade my version because, althought not like in Tiger, it works fine: not obviously like in Tiger, but quite fine (better than Launchbar). I use Entourage 2004 plug in too (and on my mac I have Office 2008).
I ask you what follow:
which functionalities (or plug in) do I re-gain installing it? I mean: do I find in this new (and more tidy) release all the old plug-ins?
@Ankur: I payed for Launchbar and I’m ready to support your hard work. I begin with a first donation via Paypal (also if I’m not still using your release).
posted by Mifolame on April 2, 2008 8:45 pm | Permalink
There is very little new functionality in the B5X releases; mostly improved performance. If you need to use file tagging and other plugins, you should probably wait a little bit until the remaining bugs are fixed in this version, or until the new Leopard-only version Quicksilver is released, whichever comes first.
published by Ankur on April 2, 2008 11:38 pm | Permalink
Is there a feature where you can call the “Append Text..” action but direct it to .rtf files “that are already open”? I’ve encountered problems using non-.txt files or .txt files that are already open with that action and the “Append Text” feature I think, personally, is one of the most impressive of QS’s already bodacious framework.
reasonded by John Kooz on July 12, 2008 6:02 am | Permalink
John, if you have the file open in an app like TextEdit, then perform “append text” with QS, then save the file in TextEdit - you’ll overwrite the changes, no? (It is possible to do what you’re after: loop through all open windows, check if anyone of them have the file open, if they do, then switch to that window, scroll to the end of the file and send the appropriate keystrokes; this would be more suited to an AppleScript.)
posted by Ankur on July 12, 2008 1:47 pm | Permalink
Hey ankur. Thanks for the response. I tried that and it doesn’t reveal the QS-appendings to the already open file. Also, what’s the scoop on QS appending text to .rtf files? Thanks!
stated by John Kooz on July 13, 2008 6:03 am | Permalink
Wha…?
There is no scoop - yet. (Bug fixes are the priority at the moment)
published by Ankur on July 13, 2008 11:34 am | Permalink
Great . I’ll most likely fiddle with apple script. That’s definitey my bag recently.
composed by John Kooz on July 14, 2008 12:21 am | Permalink
ANKUR, thework you have done to QS, has it been committed to the other builds or are you on a separate branch? Do you know anything about b56?
I ask only because I am using your b55 and wasn’t sure whether an upgrade to b56 would be bad for my health. Is b56 an extension ot YOUR b55?
Thanks
announced by seyDoggy on July 14, 2008 12:50 am | Permalink
seydoggy: as i understand, ankur had commited his changes and built from the same branch (r76 was what he built his version from IIRC), so the changes he made before are in B56 along with all the new ones. But I think Ankur’s memory optimisations are not part of the new build. Correct?
stated by Ian on July 14, 2008 4:13 am | Permalink
where can I get the opensource code for quicksilver? Where do you guys access that?
I’m interested in infusing some applescripts with some of its features (This will probably just entail calling the separate scripts, instead of dealing with actual code, though…0
in what language was quicksilver written?
thanks.
voiced by John Kooz on July 14, 2008 4:19 am | Permalink
SeyDoggy, Ian is correct. b56 is an extension of the ‘release’ (wasn’t really a release) I made.
John, you can add AppleScript actions to ~/Library/Application Support/Quicksilver/Actions/. (Quicksilver is written in Objective-C; code is at Google)
uttered by Ankur on July 14, 2008 9:13 am | Permalink
Thanks Ian and ANKUR. I might give B56 a try then.
proclaimed by seyDoggy on July 14, 2008 11:14 am | Permalink
When will this be ready for download?
written by Steve on August 18, 2008 2:52 pm | Permalink
Pages: « 1 2 [3] Show All
Leave a comment